[Investigation of gastric cancers detected at a medical check-up center].

Most of the gastric cancers investigated in this study were detected during mass screening at a Medical Check-up Center. The research period was 5 years, from 1990 to 1994. The total number of patients undergoing initial gastric examinations was 300,658. Four point eight percent of these needed detailed examinations, and 77.2% actually underwent detailed examinations. Over the 5 years, the number of gastric cancers detected was 253. The rate of detection of these cancers was almost unchanged every year, with the average rate of change being 0.11%. The rate of detected gastric cancers was investigated according to age and sex. No cancers were found below age 29, and the rate gradually rose over age 30. Over age 50, the rate in males was twice that in females. The rate of early gastric cancers was 66.4% of all reported cancers. As regards location of 253 cases, 16.5% were in the C-area, 45.8% in the M-area, 36.2% in the A-area; 19.2% were in the greater curvature, 33.9% were in the lesser curvature, 17.3% in the anterior wall, and 26.1% in the posterior wall. The sizes of the lesions were as follows: 11.5% were below 1.0 cm, 29.6% were from 1.1 cm to 2.0 cm, 46.6% were from 2.1 cm to 5.0 cm, and 12.3% were over 5.1 cm. It was considered that indirect X-rays were slightly inferior to direct X-rays in detecting early gastric cancer. The X-ray positionings in which cancers were detected were: 75.7% by supine double contrast and 48.6% by compression in 144 cases of early cancer. On the other hand, the rate were 75.6% by supine double contrast, and 51.2% by compression in 82 cases of advanced cancer. A similar tendency was found in one-shot X-ray positioning which revealed cancers. The rate of gastric cancer notdetected by X-ray pictures was 5.9% of the 253 cases. The size of the cancers notdetected by X-ray was within 2.0 cm in all cases. 58.7% of the 155 early cancer patients and 48.2% of the 83 advanced cancer patients had examinations the previous year. Therefore, it is clear that some cases of advanced cancer were not detected in the mass gastric screenings. Endoscopically, 7 cases of gastric cancer were diagnosed correctly by means of repeated biopsies which were needed 3 or 4 times over 3 to 18 months owing to pseudonegative findings on the first bioptic examination. Consequently, it is necessary to make naked eye diagnosis by endoscopic examination. Six cases of death from gastric cancer were certified within one year after normal diagnosis during the mass screening. Three cases were Borr. 4, 2 cases Borr. 3, and 1 case was Borr 2. A retrospective investigation of X-ray pictures showed that it would have been difficult to identify the lesions in these cases. The above results show that the accuracy of examinations and diagnosis must be raised in mass gastric screenings, but it is doubtful whether relying on the present methods of screening will lead to a marked improvement. For the purpose of increasing the effectiveness of mass gastric screening, we would emphasize the necessity of the following new tests; serum pepsinogen measurement, reinvestigation of patient's ages, shortening the intervals between examinations in high risk groups, using direct X-rays rather than indirect X-rays, and intermitted endoscopic examinations.